The list below includes a selection of papers which deal with Meta-Reasoning issues. It is clearly not an exhaustive list. Suggestions for additional papers to include in this list are welcome 
| Year | Reference | Official publication | Pre-print | Misc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Ackerman, R., & Thompson, V. (2017). Meta-Reasoning: Monitoring and control of thinking and reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(8), 607-617. | Sciencedirect | ||
| 2017 | Ackerman, R., & Beller, Y. (2017). Shared and distinct cue utilization for metacognitive judgments during reasoning and memorisation. Thinking & Reasoning, 23:4, 376-408. | Tandfonline | ||
| 2013 | De Neys, W., Rossi, S., & Houdé, O. (2013). Bats, balls, and substitution sensitivity: Cognitive misers are no happy fools. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 269-273. | Springer | ||
| 2015 | Lubin, A., Houdé, O., & De Neys, W. (2015). Evidence for children's error sensitivity during arithmetic word problem solving. Learning and Instruction, 40, 1-8. | Sciencedirect | ||
| 2017 | Bago, B., & De Neys, W. (2017). Fast logic?: Examining the time course assumption of dual process theory. Cognition, 158, 90-109. | Sciencedirect | ||
| 2012 | Ackerman, R., & Zalmanov, H. (2012). The persistence of the fluency-confidence association in problem solving. Psychonomic Bulleting & Review, 19(6), 1189-1192. | Springer | ||
| 2012 | Thompson, V.A. & Morsanyi, K. (2012). Analytic thinking: Do you feel like it? Mind & Society, 11, 93-105. | Springer | ||
| 2013 | Thompson, V., Prowse Turner, J., Pennycook, G., Ball, L., Brack, H., Ophir, Y., & Ackerman, R. (2013). The role of answer fluency and perceptual fluency as metacognitive cues for initiating analytic thinking. Cognition, 128, 237-251. | Sciencedirect | ||
| 2014 | Ackerman, R. (2014). The Diminishing Criterion Model for metacognitive regulation of time investment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(3), 1349-1368. | APA PsycNET Supplementary Materials | ||
| 2016 | Trippas, D., Handley, S.J., Verde, M. & Morsanyi, K. (2016). Logic brightens my day: Evidence for implicit sensitivity to logical validity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 42, 1448-1457. | APA PsycNET | ||
| 2012 | Morsanyi, K., & Handley, S.J. (2012). Logic feels so good -I like it! Evidence for intuitive detection of logicality in syllogistic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 38, 596-616. | APA PsycNET | ||
| 2015 | Ackerman, R. & Thompson, V. (2015). Meta-Reasoning: What can we learn from meta-memory. In A. Feeney & V. Thompson (Eds.), Reasoning as Memory (pp. 164-182). Hove, UK: Psychology Press. | |||
| 2016 | Žauhar, V., Bajšanski, I., & Domijan, D. (2016). Concurrent Dynamics of Category Learning and Metacognitive Judgments. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(1473), 1–11. | Frontiers | ||
| 2017 | Christensen, B. T., & Ball, L. J. (2017). Fluctuating epistemic uncertainty in a design team as a metacognitive driver for creative cognitive processes. In B. T. Christensen, L. J. Ball, & K. Halskov, K. (Eds.), Analysing design thinking: Studies of cross-cultural co-creation (pp. 249-269). London: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. |  | ||
| 2009 | Thompson, V. A. (2009). Dual-process theories: A metacognitive perspective. In J. Evans and K. Frankish (Eds.) In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond (pp. 171-195). Oxford: Oxford University Press. | | ||
| 2011 | Thompson, V.A., ProwseTurner, J., & Pennycook, G. (2011). Intuition, Metacognition, and Reason. Cognitive Psychology, 63, 107-140. | Sciencedirect | ||
| 2016 | Sidi, Y., Ophir, Y., Ackerman, R. (2016). Generalizing Screen Inferiority - Does the Medium, Screen versus Paper, Affect Performance Even with Brief Tasks? Metacognition & Learning, 11(1), 15-33. | Springer | ||
| 2017 | Ackerman, R. & Thompson, V. (2017). Meta-Reasoning: Shedding meta-cognitive light on reasoning research. L. Ball & V. Thompson (Eds.), International Handbook of Thinking & Reasoning. Psychology Press. | | ||
| 2017 | Sidi, Y., Shpigelman, M., Zalmanov, H., & Ackerman, R. (2017). Understanding metacognitive inferiority on screen by exposing cues for depth of processing. Learning and Instruction, 51, 61-73. | Sciencedirect | ||
| 2016 | Johnson, E. D., Tubau, E., & De Neys, W. (2016). The doubting System 1: Evidence for automatic substitution sensitivity. Acta Psychologica, 164, 56-64. | Sciencedirect | ||
| 2006 | Shynkaruk, J. M., & Thompson, V. A. (2006). Confidence and accuracy in deductive reasoning. Memory & cognition, 34(3), 619-632. | Springer | ||
| 2015 | Markovits, H., Thompson, V. A., & Brisson, J. (2015). Metacognition and abstract reasoning. Memory & cognition, 43(4), 681-693. | Springer | ||
| 2018 | Frey, D., Johnson, E. D., & De Neys, W. (2018). Individual differences in conflict detection during reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(5), 1188-1208. | | ||
| 2016 | Ball, L. J., & Stupple, E. J. N. (2016). Dual reasoning processes and the resolution of uncertainty: The case of belief bias. In L. Macchi, M. Bagassi, & R. Viale (Eds.), Cognitive unconscious and human rationality (pp. 143-165). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. | |||
| 2000 | Quayle, J. D., & Ball, L. J. (2000). Working memory, metacognitive uncertainty, and belief bias in syllogistic reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 1202-1223. | Tandfonline | ||
| 2013 | Wiltschnig, S., Christensen, B. T., & Ball, L. J. (2013). Collaborative problem–solution co-evolution in creative design. Design Studies, 34, 515-542. | Sciencedirect | ||
| 2009 | Ball, L. J., & Christensen, B. T. (2009). Analogical reasoning and mental simulation in design: Two strategies linked to uncertainty resolution. Design Studies, 30, 169-186. | Sciencedirect | ||
| 2010 | Ball, L. J., Onarheim, B., & Christensen, B. T. (2010). Design requirements, epistemic uncertainty and solution development strategies in software design. Design Studies, 31, 567-589. | Sciencedirect | ||
| 2013 | Stupple, E. J. N., Ball, L. J., & Ellis, D. (2013). Matching bias in syllogistic reasoning: Evidence for a dual-process account from response times and confidence ratings. Thinking & Reasoning, 19, 54-77. | Tandfonline | ||
| 1986 | Metcalfe, J. (1986). Feeling of knowing in memory and problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12(2), 288-294. | semanticscholar | ||
| 1987 | Metcalfe, J., & Wiebe, D. (1987). Intuition in insight and noninsight problem solving. Memory & cognition, 15(3), 238-246. | Springer | ||
| 2003 | Vernon, D., & Usher, M. (2003). Dynamics of metacognitive judgments: Pre-and postretrieval mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(3), 339-346. | APA PsycNET | ||
| 2010 | Mitchum, A. L., & Kelley, C. M. (2010). Solve the problem first: constructive solution strategies can influence the accuracy of retrospective confidence judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(3), 699-710. | APA PsycNET | ||
| 2010 | Topolinski, S., & Reber, R. (2010). Gaining insight into the “Aha” experience. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(6), 402-405. | Sage | ||
| 2014 | Stankov, L., Kleitman, S., and Jackson, S. A. (2014). Measures of the Trait of Confidence. In G. J. Boyle, D. H. Saklofske and G. Matthews (Eds.), Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Constructs, 158-189. Academic Press. | ResearchGate | ||
| 2016 | Jackson, S. A., Kleitman, S., Howie, P., & Stankov, L. (2016). Cognitive abilities, monitoring confidence, and control thresholds explain individual differences in heuristics and biases. Frontiers in psychology, 7(1559). | Frontiers | ||
| 2016 | Jackson, S. A. (2016). Greater response cardinality indirectly reduces confidence. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28(4), 496-504. | Tandfonline | ||
| 2014 | Bajšanski, I., Močibob, M., & Valerjev, P. (2014). Metacognitive judgments and syllogistic reasoning. Psychological Topics, 23(1), 143-165. | Hrcak | ||
| 2016 | Hedne, M. R., Norman, E., & Metcalfe, J. (2016). Intuitive feelings of warmth and confidence in insight and noninsight problem solving of magic tricks. Frontiers in psychology, 7:1314. | semanticscholar | ||
| 2017 | Valerjev, P., & Dujmović, M. (2017). Instruction type and believability influence on metareasoning in a base rate task. In: G. Gunzelmann, A. Howes, T. Tenbrink, E. Davelaar (Eds.), Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 3429-3434.). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. | CogSci | | |
| 2016 | Dujmović, M., & Valerjev, P. (2016). Metacognitive assessment of visual search tasks by 5th and 8th grade children. In: Lj. Lazarević, S. Marković, D. Pavlović Babić, O. Tošković, O. Marković Rosić (Eds.), Proceedings of the XXII Empirical Studies in Psychology conference (pp. 123-128). Belgrade: Institute for psychology, Faculty of phylosophy, University of Belgrade. | Empirical Studies in Psychology | | |
| 2013 | Mata, A., Ferreira, M. B., & Sherman, S. J. (2013). The metacognitive advantage of deliberative thinkers: A dual-process perspective on overconfidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 353–373. | APA PsycNET | ||
| 2014 | Mata, A., & Almeida, T. (2014). Using metacognitive cues to infer others’ thinking. Judgment and Decision Making, 9, 349–359. | APA PsycNET | ||
| 2017 | Pennycook, G., Ross, R. M., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2017). Dunning–Kruger effects in reasoning: Theoretical implications of the failure to recognize incompetence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24 (6), 1174-1784. | Springer | ||
| 2017 | Dujmović, M., & Valerjev, P. (2017). An image is worth a thousand words, but what of numbers? The impact of multi-modal processing on response times and judgments of confidence in base-rate tasks. In: O. Tošković, K. Damnjanović, Lj. Lazarević (Eds.), Proceedings of the XXIII Science Conference Empirical Studies in Psychology (pp. 30-36). | | ||
| 2015 | Mercier, H., Trouche, E., Yama, H., Heintz, C., & Girotto, V. (2015). Experts and laymen grossly underestimate the benefits of argumentation for reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(3), 341-355. | Tandfonline | ||
| 2018 | Žauhar, V., Bajšanski, I., & Domijan, D. (2018). The influence of rule availability and item similarity on metacognitive monitoring during categorisation. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 30(2), 138-162. | Tandfonline | ||
| 2018 | Baars, M., Leopold, C., & Paas, F. (2018). Self-explaining steps in problem-solving tasks to improve self-regulation in secondary education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(4), 578–595. | APA PsycNET | ||
| 2017 | Baars, M., Wijnia, L., & Paas, F. (2017). The association between motivation, affect, and self-regulated learning when solving problems. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1346. | Frontiers | ||
| 2017 | Baars, M., Van Gog, T., de Bruin, A., & Paas, F. (2017). Effects of problem solving after worked example study on secondary school children’s monitoring accuracy. Educational Psychology, 37, 810-834. | Tandfonline | ||
| 2014 | Baars, M., Van Gog, T., de Bruin, A., & Paas, F. (2014). Effects of problem solving after worked example study on primary school children's monitoring accuracy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 382-391. | Wiley | ||
| 2014 | Baars, M., Vink, S., Van Gog, T., de Bruin, A., & Paas, F. (2014). Effects of training self-assessment and using assessment standards on retrospective and prospective monitoring of problem solving. Learning and Instruction, 33, 92-107. | Sciencedirect | ||
| 2013 | Baars, M., Visser, S., Van Gog, T., de Bruin, A., & Paas, F. (2013). Completion of partially worked examples as a generation strategy for improving monitoring accuracy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 395-406. | Sciencedirect | ||
| 2017 | Lieder, F., & Griffiths, T. L. (2017). Strategy selection as rational metareasoning. Psychological Review, 124(6), 762-794. | APA PsycNET | ||
| 2017 | Shenhav, A., Musslick, S., Lieder, F., Kool, W., Griffiths, T. L., Cohen, J. D., & Botvinick, M. M. (2017). Toward a rational and mechanistic account of mental effort. Annual review of neuroscience, 40, 99-124. | Annual Review | ||
| 2017 | Milli, S., Lieder, F., & Griffiths, T. (2017, February). When does bounded-optimal metareasoning favor few cognitive systems?. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 31, No. 1). | AAAI | ||
| 2014 | Lieder, F., Plunkett, D., Hamrick, J.B., Russell, S.J, Hay, N.J., & Griffiths, T.L. (2014). Algorithm Selection by Rational Metareasoning as a Model of Human Strategy Selection. In Z. Ghahramani, M. Welling, C. Cortes, N.D. Lawrence, and K.Q. Weinberger (Eds.). Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 27, pp. 2870-2878. | NIPS | ||
| 2018 | Dujmović, M., & Valerjev, P. (2018). The influence of conflict monitoring on meta-reasoning and response times in a base rate task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(12), 2548-2561. | Sage | | |
| 2018 | Lieder, F., Shenhav, A., Musslick, S., & Griffiths, T. L. (2018). Rational metareasoning and the plasticity of cognitive control. PLoS computational biology, 14(4), e1006043. | Sage | ResearchGate | |
| 2018 | Ball, L. J., Threadgold, E., Solowiej, A., & Marsh, J. E. (2018). Can Intrinsic and Extrinsic Metacognitive Cues Shield Against Distraction in Problem Solving?. Journal of Cognition, 1(1), 15. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5334/joc.9 | J. of Cognition | ||
| 2014 | Thompson, V. A., & Johnson, S. C. (2014). Conflict, metacognition, and analytic thinking. Thinking & Reasoning, 20(2), 215-244. | Tandfonline | ||
| 2019 | Bajšanski, I., Žauhar, V., & Valerjev, P. (2019). Confidence judgments in syllogistic reasoning: the role of consistency and response cardinality. Thinking & Reasoning, 25(1), 14-47. | Tandfonline | ||
| 2020 | Danek, A.H., Williams, J. & Wiley, J. (2020). Closing the gap: connecting sudden representational change to the subjective Aha! experience in insightful problem solving. Psychological Research, 84, 111–119. | Springer | ||
| 2017 | Danek, A. H., & Wiley, J. (2017). What about false insights? Deconstructing the Aha! Experience along its multiple dimensions for correct and incorrect solutions separately. Frontiers in psychology, 7:2077. | Frontiers | ||
| 2011 | Payne, S. J., & Duggan, G. B. (2011). Giving up problem solving. Memory & cognition, 39(5), 902-913. | Springer | ||
| 2016 | Siedlecka, M., Paulewicz, B., & Wierzchoń, M. (2016). But I was so sure! Metacognitive judgments are less accurate given prospectively than retrospectively. Frontiers in psychology, 7:218. | Frontiers | ||
| 2014 | Pennycook, G., Trippas, D., Handley, S. J., & Thompson, V. A. (2014). Base rates: Both neglected and intuitive. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(2), 544-554. | APA | ||
| 2014 | Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Barr, N., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2014). Cognitive style and religiosity: The role of conflict detection. Memory & Cognition, 42(1), 1-10. | Springer | ||
| 2015 | Pennycook, G., Fugelsang, J. A., & Koehler, D. J. (2015). What makes us think? A three-stage dual-process model of analytic engagement. Cognitive Psychology, 80, 34-72. | Sciencedirect | ||
| 2018 | Ball, L. J., Threadgold, E., Marsh, J. E., & Christensen, B. T. (2018). The effects of stimulus complexity and conceptual fluency on aesthetic judgments of abstract art: Evidence for a default–interventionist account. Metaphor & Symbol, 33, 235-252. | Tandfonline | ||
| 2018 | Noah, T., Schul, Y., & Mayo, R. (2018). Thinking of oneself as an object of observation reduces reliance on metacognitive information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(7), 1023-1042. | APA | ||
| 2014 | Mata, A., Schubert, A. L., & Ferreira, M. B. (2014). The role of language comprehension in reasoning: How “good-enough” representations induce biases. Cognition, 133(2), 457-463. | Sciencedirect | ||
| 2017 | Mata, A., Ferreira, M. B., Voss, A., & Kollei, T. (2017). Seeing the conflict: an attentional account of reasoning errors. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(6), 1980-1986. | Springer | ||
| 2018 | Mata, A., & Ferreira, M. B. (2018). Response: Commentary: Seeing the conflict: an attentional account of reasoning errors. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 24. | Frontiers | ||
| 2018 | Grossner, E. C., Bernier, R. A., Brenner, E. K., Chiou, K. S., & Hillary, F. G. (2018). Prefrontal gray matter volume predicts metacognitive accuracy following traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychology, 32(4), 484-494. | APA PsycNET | ||
| 2018 | Laukkonen, R. E., & Tangen, J. M. (2018). How to detect insight moments in problem solving experiments. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 282. | Frontiers | ||
| 2008 | Reber, R., Brun, M., & Mitterndorfer, K. (2008). The use of heuristics in intuitive mathematical judgment. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 1174–1178. | Springer | ||
| 2016 | Ais, J., Zylberberg, A., Barttfeld, P., & Sigman, M. (2016). Individual consistency in the accuracy and distribution of confidence judgments. Cognition, 146, 377-386. | Sciencedirect | ||
| 2018 | Valerjev, P. & Dujmović, M. (2018). The effect of stimulus onset asynchrony between different response cues on reasoning in a base rate task. In K. Damnjanović, I. Stepanović Ilić, & S. Marković (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Scientific Conference Empirical Studies In Psychology (pp. 12-14). Belgrade: Institute of Psychology, Laboratory for Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade. | ResearchGate | ||
| 2014 | Caro, M. F., Josyula, D. P., Cox, M. T., & Jiménez, J. A. (2014). Design and validation of a metamodel for metacognition support in artificial intelligent systems. Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures, 9, 82-104. | Sciencedirect | ||
| 2015 | Caro, M. F., Josyula, D. P., Jiménez, J. A., Kennedy, C. M., & Cox, M. T. (2015). A domain-specific visual language for modeling metacognition in intelligent systems. Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures, 13, 75-90. | Sciencedirect | ||
| 1996 | Kelley, C. M., & Jacoby, L. L. (1996). Adult egocentrism: Subjective experience versus analytic bases for judgment. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(2), 157-175. | Sciencedirect | ||
| 2016 | Siedlecka, M., Paulewicz, B., & Wierzchoń, M. (2016). But I was so sure! Metacognitive judgments are less accurate given prospectively than retrospectively. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 218. | Frontiers | ||
| 2009 | Prowse Turner, J. A., & Thompson, V. A. (2009). The role of training, alternative models, and logical necessity in determining confidence in syllogistic reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 15(1), 69-100. | Tandfonline | ||
| 2019 | Griffiths, T.L., Callaway, F., Chang. M., Grant, E., Krueger, P. M., & Lieder, F. (2019). Doing more with less: Meta-reasoning and meta-learning in humans and machines. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 29, 24-30. doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.01.005 | Sciencedirect | ||
| 2020 | Lieder, F., & Griffiths, T. L. (2020). Resource-rational analysis: understanding human cognition as the optimal use of limited computational resources. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 43. | BBS | ||
| 2018 | Loesche, F., Goslin, J., & Bugmann, G. (2018). Paving the way to eureka—introducing “Dira” as an experimental paradigm to observe the process of creative problem solving. Frontiers in psychology, 9. | Frontiers | ||
| 2016 | Fernandez Cruz, A. L., Arango-Muñoz, S., & Volz, K. G. (2016). Oops, scratch that! Monitoring one’s own errors during mental calculation. Cognition, 146, 110-120. | Sciencedirect | ||
| 2020 | Puente‐Diaz, R., & Cavazos‐Arroyo, J. (2020). Creative metacognitive feelings as a source of information for creative self‐efficacy, creativity potential, intrapersonal idea selection, and task enjoyment. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(3), 499-507. | Wiley | ||
| 2018 | Logg, J. M., Haran, U., & Moore, D. A. (2018). Is overconfidence a motivated bias? Experimental evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(10), 1445-1465. doi: 2018-48183-001 | APA PsycNET | ||
| 2019 | Aidman, E., Jackson, S. A., & Kleitman, S. (2019). Effects of sleep deprivation on executive functioning, cognitive abilities, metacognitive confidence, and decision making. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(2), 188-200. | Wiley | ||
| 2012 | Fiedler, K. (2012). Meta-cognitive myopia and the dilemmas of inductive-statistical inference. In Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 57, pp. 1-55). Academic Press. | APA PsycNET | ||
| 2019 | Fiedler, K., Hütter, M., Schott, M., & Kutzner, F. (2019). Metacognitive myopia and the overutilization of misleading advice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 32(3), 317-333. | Wiley | ||
| 2019 | Lauterman, T., & Ackerman, R. (2019). Initial judgment of solvability in non-verbal problems–A predictor of solving processes. Metacognition and Learning, 14(3), 365-383. | Springer | ||
| 2015 | Mevel, K., Poirel, N., Rossi, S., Cassotti, M., Simon, G., Houdé, O., & De Neys, W. (2015). Bias detection: Response confidence evidence for conflict sensitivity in the ratio bias task. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(2), 227-237. | Tandfonline | ||
| 2011 | De Neys, W., Cromheeke, S., & Osman, M. (2011). Biased but in doubt: Conflict and decision confidence. PloS one, 6(1), e15954. | PlosOne | ||
| 2008 | De Neys, W., & Glumicic, T. (2008). Conflict monitoring in dual process theories of thinking. Cognition, 106(3), 1248-1299. | Sciencedirect | ||
| 2016 | Aczel, B., Szollosi, A., & Bago, B. (2016). Lax monitoring versus logical intuition: The determinants of confidence in conjunction fallacy. Thinking & Reasoning, 22(1), 99-117. | Tandfonline | ||
| 2017 | Scherer, L. D., Yates, J. F., Baker, S. G., & Valentine, K. D. (2017). The influence of effortful thought and cognitive proficiencies on the conjunction fallacy: implications for dual-process theories of reasoning and judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(6), 874-887. | Sage | ||
| 2019 | Ackerman, R. (2019). Heuristic cues for meta-reasoning judgments: Review and methodology. Psychological Topics, 28(1), 1-20. | HRCAK | Open access | |
| 2019 | Morsanyi, K., Cheallaigh, N. N. & Ackerman, R. (2019). Mathematics anxiety and metacognitive Processes: Proposal for a new line of inquiry. Psychological Topics, 28 (1), 147-169. | HRCAK | Open access | |
| 2019 | Meta-Reasoning SPECIAL ISSUE in Psychological topics. Guest Editor: Igor Bajšanski | HRCAK | Open access | |
| 2019 | Dentakos, S., Saoud, W., Ackerman, R., & Toplak, M. E. (2019). Does domain matter? Monitoring accuracy across domains. Metacognition and Learning, 14(3), 413-436. | Springer | ||
| 2019 | Beeson, N., Stupple, E. J. N., Schofield, M. B. & Staples, P. (2019). Mental Models or Probabilistic Reasoning or Both: Reviewing the Evidence for and Implications of Dual-Strategy Models of Deductive Reasoning. Psychological Topics, 28 (1), 21-35. | HRCAK | ||
| 2019 | Wang, S. & Thompson, V. (2019). Fluency and Feeling of Rightness: The Effect of Anchoring and Models. Psychological Topics, 28 (1), 37-72. | HRCAK | ||
| 2019 | Bajšanski, I. & Žauhar, V. (2019). The Relationship between Consistency and Consensuality in Syllogistic Reasoning. Psychological Topics, 28 (1), 73-91. | HRCAK | ||
| 2019 | Valerjev, P. & Dujmović, M. (2019). Performance and Metacognition in Scientific Reasoning: The Covariation Detection Task. Psychological Topics, 28 (1), 93-113. | HRCAK | ||
| 2019 | Mata, A. (2019). Further Tests of the Metacognitive Advantage Model: Counterfactuals, Confidence and Affect. Psychological Topics, 28 (1), 115-124. | HRCAK | ||
| 2019 | Putarek, V. & Vlahović-Štetić, V. (2019). Metacognitive Feelings, Conflict Detection and Illusion of Linearity. Psychological Topics, 28 (1), 171-192. | HRCAK | ||
| 2019 | Wanstall, E. A., Doidge, J., Weiss, J. & Toplak, M. E. (2019). Estimations of Competence in Neurodevelopmental Conditions: A Review. Psychological Topics, 28 (1), 193-232. | HRCAK | ||
| 2020 | Fiedler, K., Schott, M., Kareev, Y., Avrahami, J., Ackerman, R., Goldsmith, M., Mata, A., Ferreira, M. B., Newell, B. R., & Pantazi, M. (2020). Metacognitive myopia in change detection: A collective approach to overcome a persistent anomaly. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46(4), 649–668. | APA PsycNET | ||
| 2017 | Koriat, A. (2017). Can people identify “deceptive” or “misleading” items that tend to produce mostly wrong answers?. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 30(5), 1066-1077. | Wiley | ||
| 2019 | Amidu, A. R., Boyd, D., & Agboola, A. O. (2019). The role of knowledge in valuation practice: expert valuers’ perceptions. Journal of Property Investment & Finance. | Emerald | ||
| 2020 | Mata, A. (2020). Conflict detection and social perception: Bringing meta-reasoning and social cognition together. Thinking & Reasoning, 26(1), 140-149. | Tandfonline | ||
| 2019 | Mata, A. (2019). Social metacognition in moral judgment: Decisional conflict promotes perspective taking. Journal of personality and social psychology, 117(6), 1061–1082. | APA PsycNET | ||
| 2019 | Fiedler, K., Ackerman, R., & Scarampi, C. (2019). Metacognition: Monitoring and controlling one’s own knowledge, reasoning and decisions. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Funke (Eds.). Introduction to the Psychology of Human Thought (pp. 89-111). Heidelberg: Heidelberg University Publishing. | Heidelberg Univ. Publishing | Open access | |
| 2019 | Caro, M. F., Josyula, D. P., Madera, D. P., Kennedy, C. M., & Gómez, A. A. (2019). The CARINA Metacognitive Architecture. International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence (IJCINI), 13(4), 71-90. | IGI Global | ||
| 2019 | Walker, A., Turpin, M. H., Fugelsang, J., & Koehler, D. (2019). Intuition speed as a predictor of choice and confidence in point spread predictions. Judgment and Decision Making, 14(2), 148-155. | SSRN | ||
| 2017 | Szollosi, A., Bago, B., Szaszi, B., & Aczel, B. (2017). Exploring the determinants of confidence in the bat-and-ball problem. Acta psychologica, 180, 1-7. | Sciencedirect | ||
| 2020 | Littrell, S., Fugelsang, J., & Risko, E. F. (2020). Overconfidently underthinking: Narcissism negatively predicts cognitive reflection. Thinking & Reasoning, 26(3), 352-380. | Tandfonline | ||
| 2019 | Hoover, J. D., & Healy, A. F. (2019). The bat-and-ball problem: Stronger evidence in support of a conscious error process. Decision, 6 (4), 369-380. | APA PsycNET | ||
| 2019 | Bago, B., & De Neys, W. (2019). The smart System 1: Evidence for the intuitive nature of correct responding on the bat-and-ball problem. Thinking & Reasoning, 25(3), 257-299. | Tandfonline | ||
| 2019 | Webb, M. E., Cropper, S. J., & Little, D. R. (2019). “Aha!” is stronger when preceded by a “huh?”: presentation of a solution affects ratings of aha experience conditional on accuracy. Thinking & Reasoning, 25(3), 324-364. | Tandfonline | ||
| 2019 | Ball, L. J., & Christensen, B. T. (2019). Advancing an understanding of design cognition and design metacognition: Progress and prospects. Design Studies, 65, 35-59. | Sciencedirect | ||
| 2020 | Laukkonen, R. E., Kaveladze, B. T., Tangen, J. M., & Schooler, J. W. (2020). The dark side of Eureka: Artificially induced Aha moments make facts feel true. Cognition, 196, 104122. | Sciencedirect | ||
| 2017 | Jackson, S. A., Kleitman, S., Stankov, L. & Howie, P. (2017). Individual differences in decision making depend on cognitive abilities, monitoring and control. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 30(2), 209-223. | Wiley | ||
| 2016 | Jackson, S. A., Kleitman, S., Howie, P. and Stankov, L. (2016). Cognitive abilities, monitoring, and control explain individual differences in heuristics and biases. Frontiers-Psychology, 7. DOI=10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01559. | Frontiers | ||
| 2016 | Jackson, S. A., Kleitman, S., Stankov, L. & Howie, P. (2016). Decision pattern analysis as a general framework for studying individual differences in decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29(4), 392-408. | Wiley | ||
| 2018 | Jackson, S.A., Martin, G. D., Aidman, E., & Kleitman, S. (2018). Acute short-term sleep deprivation does not affect metacognitive monitoring captured by confidence ratings: A systematic literature review. Metacognition & Learning, 13(1), 39–56. | Springer | ||
| 2020 | Blanchard, M. D., Jackson, S. A., & Kleitman, S. (2020). Collective decision making reduces metacognitive control and increases error rates, particularly for overconfident individuals. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 33(3), 348-375. | Wiley | ||
| 2019 | Kleitman, S., Hui, J. S. W., & Jiang, Y. (2019). Confidence to spare: individual differences in cognitive and metacognitive arrogance and competence. Metacognition and Learning, 14(3), 479-508. | Springer | ||
| 2020 | Sidi, Y., Torgovitsky, I., Soibelman, D., Miron-Spektor, E., & Ackerman, R. (2020). You may be more original than you think: Predictable biases in self-assessment of originality. Acta Psychologica, 203, 103002. | Sciencedirect | Article in Psychology Today | |
| 2019 | Bilalić, M., Graf, M., Vaci, N., & Danek, A.H. (2019).When the solution is on the doorstep: Better solving performance, but diminished Aha! experience for chess experts on the mutilated checkerboard problem. Cognitive Science, 43(8): e12771. | Wiley | ||
| 2021 | Bilalić, M., Graf, M., Vaci, N., & Danek, A. H. (2021). The temporal dynamics of insight problem solving–restructuring might not always be sudden. Thinking & Reasoning, 27(1), 1-37. | Tandfonline | ||
| 2020 | Rahnev, D., Desender, K., Lee, A. L., Adler, W. T., Aguilar-Lleyda, D., Akdoğan, B., ... & Bègue, I. (2020). The confidence database. Nature human behaviour, 4(3), 317-325. | Nature | ||
| 2020 | Pétervári, J., & Danek, A. H. (2020). Problem solving of magic tricks: guiding to and through an impasse with solution cues. Thinking & Reasoning, 26(4), 502-533. | Tandfonline | ||
| 2020 | Ackerman, R., Yom-Tov, E., & Torgovitsky, I. (2020). Using confidence and consensuality to predict time invested in problem solving and in real-life web searching. Cognition, 199, 104248. | ScienceDirect | ||
| 2021 | Vega, S., Mata, A., Ferreira, M. B., & Vaz, A. R. (2021). Metacognition in moral decisions: judgment extremity and feeling of rightness in moral intuitions. Thinking & Reasoning, 27(1), 124-141. | Tandfonline | ||
| 2020 | Di Gregorio, F., Maier, M. E., & Steinhauser, M. (2020). Are errors detected before they occur? Early error sensations revealed by metacognitive judgments on the timing of error awareness. Consciousness and Cognition, 77, 102857. | ScienceDirect | ||
| 2019 | Ammalainen, A., & Moroshkina, N. (2019). When an Error Leads to Confidence: False Insight and Feeling of Knowing in Anagram Solving. Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics, 16(4), 774-783. | Psy-Journal | ||
| 2019 | Webb, M. E., Laukkonen, R. E., Cropper, S. J., & Little, D. R. (2019). Commentary: Moment of (Perceived) Truth: Exploring Accuracy of Aha! Experiences. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 55 (2), 289-293. | Wiley | ||
| 2021 | Bilalić, M., Graf, M., Vaci, N., & Danek, A. H. (2021). The temporal dynamics of insight problem solving–restructuring might not always be sudden. Thinking & Reasoning, 27(1), 1-37. | Tandfonline | ||
| 2020 | Bago, B., & De Neys, W. (2020). Advancing the specification of dual process models of higher cognition: A critical test of the hybrid model view. Thinking & Reasoning, 26(1), 1-30. | Tandfonline | ||
| 2020 | Mata, A. (2020). An easy fix for reasoning errors: Attention capturers improve reasoning performance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(10), 1695-1702. | Sage | ||
| 2020 | Bellon, E., Fias, W., & De Smedt, B. (2020). Metacognition across domains: Is the association between arithmetic and metacognitive monitoring domain-specific?. PloS one, 15(3), e0229932. | PlosOne | ||
| 2020 | Becker, M., Sommer, T., & Kühn, S. (2020). Verbal insight revisited: fMRI evidence for early processing in bilateral insulae for solutions with AHA! experience shortly after trial onset. Human brain mapping, 41(1), 30-45. | Wiley | ||
| 2020 | Becker, M., Wiedemann, G. & Kühn, S. (2020). Quantifying insightful problem solving: a modified compound remote associates paradigm using lexical priming to parametrically modulate different sources of task difficulty. Psychological Research , 84, 528–545. | Springer | ||
| 2021 | Dujmović, M., Valerjev, P., & Bajšanski, I. (2021). The role of representativeness in reasoning and metacognitive processes: an in-depth analysis of the Linda problem. Thinking & Reasoning, 27(2), 161-186. | Tandfonline | ||
| 2021 | Wang, Y., & Sperling, R. A. (2021). Understanding and supporting Chinese middle Schoolers’ monitoring accuracy in mathematics. Metacognition and Learning, 16(1), 57-88. | Springer | ||
| 2018 | Larue, O., Hough, A., & Juvina, I. (2018). A cognitivem model of switching between reflective and reactive decision making in the Wason task. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Cognitive Modeling (pp. 55-60). | | ||
| 2006 | Sun, R., Zhang, X., & Mathews, R. (2006). Modeling meta-cognition in a cognitive architecture. Cognitive Systems Research, 7(4), 327-338. | ScienceDirect | ||
| 2020 | Dannenhauer, D., Cox, M. T., & Munoz-Avila, H. (2018). Declarative metacognitive expectations for high-level cognition. Advances in Cognitive Systems, 6, 231-250. | |||
| 2020 | Dindar, M., Järvelä, S., & Järvenoja, H. (2020). Interplay of metacognitive experiences and performance in collaborative problem solving. Computers & Education, 103922. | ScienceDirect | ||
| 2020 | Danek, A. H., & Wiley, J. (2020). What causes the insight memory advantage?. Cognition, 205, 104411. | ScienceDirect | ||
| 2020 | Fitzsimmons, C.J., Thompson, C.A. & Sidney, P.G. (2020). Confident or familiar? The role of familiarity ratings in adults’ confidence judgments when estimating fraction magnitudes. Metacognition & Learning, 15, 215–231. | Springer | ||
| 2021 | Thompson, V.A., Elqayam, S., Ackerman, R.A. (2021). Reasoning, Rationality, and Metacognition. In: M. Knauff & W. Spohn (Eds.) Handbook of Rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. | |||
| 2020 | Williams, E. F., Duke, K. E., & Dunning, D. (2020). Consistency just feels right: Procedural fluency increases confidence in performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(12), 2395–2405. | APA PsycNET | ||
| 2021 | Spiridonov, V., Loginov, N., & Ardislamov, V. (2021). Dissociation between the subjective experience of insight and performance in the CRA paradigm. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 33(6-7), 685-699. | Tandfonline | ||
| 2021 | Laukkonen, R. E., Ingledew, D. J., Grimmer, H. J., Schooler, J. W., & Tangen, J. M. (2021). Getting a grip on insight: real-time and embodied Aha experiences predict correct solutions. Cognition and Emotion, 35(5), 918-935. | Tandfonline | ||
| 2021 | Fiedler, K., McCaughey, L., Prager, J., Eichberger, J., & Schnell, K. (2021). Speed-accuracy trade-offs in sample-based decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(6), 1203–1224. | APA PsycNET | ||
| 2020 | Fiedler, K., Krüger, T., Koch, A., & Kutzner, F. (2020). Dyadic judgments based on conflicting samples: The failure to ignore invalid input. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 33(4), 492-504. | Wiley | ||
| 2019 | Fiedler, K. (2019). Metacognitive Myopia–Gullibility as a Major Obstacle in the Way of Irrational Behavior. In Forgas, J. P., & Baumeister, R. (Eds.). (2019). The Social Psychology of Gullibility: Conspiracy Theories, Fake News and Irrational Beliefs. Routledge. | | ||
| 2018 | Fiedler, K., Hofferbert, J., & Wöllert, F. (2018). Metacognitive myopia in hidden-profile tasks: The failure to control for repetition biases. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 903. | Frontiers | ||
| 2013 | Mata, A., Fiedler, K., Ferreira, M. B., & Almeida, T. (2013). Reasoning about others' reasoning. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(3), 486-491. | ScienceDirect | ||
| 2021 | Lieder, F., & Iwama, G. (2021). Toward a formal theory of proactivity. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 21(3), 490-508. | Springer | ||
| 2021 | Urban, K., & Urban, M. (2021). Effects of performance feedback and repeated experience on self-evaluation accuracy in high-and low-performing preschool children. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 36(1), 109-124. | Springer | ||
| 2021 | Urban, K., & Urban, M. (2021). Anchoring Effect of Performance Feedback on Accuracy of Metacognitive Monitoring in Preschool Children. Europe's journal of psychology, 17(1), 104–118. | PMC | ||
| 2018 | Urban, K., & Urban, M. (2018). Influence of fluid intelligence on accuracy of metacognitive monitoring in preschool children fades with the calibration feedback. Studia Psychologica, 60(2), 123-136. | ResearchGate | ||
| 2021 | Pesout, O., & Nietfeld, J. L. (2021). How creative am I?: Examining judgments and predictors of creative performance. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 40, 100836. | ScienceDirect | ||
| 2021 | Urban, M., & Urban, K. (2021). Unskilled but aware of it? Cluster analysis of creative metacognition from preschool age to early adulthood. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(4), 937-945. | Wiley | ||
| 2022 | Purcell, Z. A., Howarth, S., Wastell, C. A., Roberts, A. J., & Sweller, N. (2022). Eye tracking and the cognitive reflection test: Evidence for intuitive correct responding and uncertain heuristic responding. Memory & Cognition, 50, 348–365. | Springer | ||
| 2021 | Chuderski, A., Jastrzębski, J., Kroczek, B., Kucwaj, H., & Ociepka, M. (2021). Metacognitive experience on Raven’s matrices versus insight problems. Metacognition and Learning, 16(1), 15-35. | Springer | ||
| 2021 | Székely, M., & Michael, J. (2021). The Sense of Effort: A cost-benefit theory of the phenomenology of mental effort. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 12, 889–904. | Springer | ||
| 2021 | Šrol, J., & De Neys, W. (2021). Predicting individual differences in conflict detection and bias susceptibility during reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 27(1), 38-68. | Tandfonline | ||
| 2021 | George, T., Mielicki, M. K., & Wiley, J. (2021). Great expectations: Misleading effects of images in the alternate uses task. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. | APA PsycNET | ||
| 2022 | Said, N., Fischer, H., & Anders, G. (2022). Contested science: Individuals with higher metacognitive insight into interpretation of evidence are less likely to polarize. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29, 668–680. | Springer | ||
| 2021 | Gambetti, E., Marinello, F., Zucchelli, M. M., Nori, R., & Giusberti, F. (2021). Fast thoughts and metacognitive feelings: The role of cognitive styles. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 34(4), 504-514. | Wiley | ||
| 2021 | Toplak, M. E. (2021). Cognitive Sophistication and the Development of Judgment and Decision-Making. Academic Press. | Elsevier | ||
| 2022 | Desender, K., & Sasanguie, D. (2022). Math anxiety relates positively to metacognitive insight into mathematical decision making. Psychological Research, 86, 1001–1013. | Springer | ||
| 2021 | Schubert, A. L., Ferreira, M. B., Mata, A., & Riemenschneider, B. (2021). A diffusion model analysis of belief bias: Different cognitive mechanisms explain how cognitive abilities and thinking styles contribute to conflict resolution in reasoning. Cognition, 211, 104629. | ScienceDirect | ||
| 2021 | Emeny, W. G., Hartwig, M. K., & Rohrer, D. (2021). Spaced mathematics practice improves test scores and reduces overconfidence. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(4), 1082-1089. | Wiley | ||
| 2022 | Laukkonen, R., Dr., Kaveladze, B., Protzko, J., Tangen, J. M., von Hippel, B., & Schooler, J. (2022). Irrelevant insights make worldviews ring true. Scientific Reports, 12, 2075. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-05923-3 | Nature | ||
| 2022 | Grimmer, H., Laukkonen, R., Tangen, J., & von Hippel, W. (2022). Eliciting false insights with semantic priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29(3), 954-970. | Springer | ||
| 2022 | Haataja, E., Malmberg, J., Dindar, M., & Järvelä, S. (2022). The pivotal role of monitoring for collaborative problem solving seen in interaction, performance, and interpersonal physiology. Metacognition and Learning, 17, 241–268. | Springer | ||
| 2022 | Stuyck, H., Cleeremans, A., & Van den Bussche, E. (2022). Aha! under pressure: The Aha! experience is not constrained by cognitive load. Cognition, 219, 104946. | ScienceDirect | ||
| 2022 | Byrd, N. (2022). Bounded Reflectivism & Epistemic Identity. Metaphilosophy, 53, 53–69. | Wiley | ||
| 2009 | Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009). The analysis of intuition: Processing fluency and affect in judgements of semantic coherence. Cognition and Emotion, 23(8), 1465-1503. | APA PsycNET | ||
| 2009 | Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009). The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(1), 39–63. | APA PsycNET | ||
| 2014 | Topolinski, S. (2014). A processing fluency-account of funniness: Running gags and spoiling punchlines. Cognition & Emotion, 28(5), 811-820. | Tandfonline | ||
| 2015 | Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2015). Corrugator activity confirms immediate negative affect in surprise. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 134. | Frontiers | ||
| 2020 | Salvi, C., Simoncini, C., Grafman, J., & Beeman, M. (2020). Oculometric signature of switch into awareness? Pupil size predicts sudden insight whereas microsaccades predict problem-solving via analysis. NeuroImage, 217, 116933. | ScienceDirect | ||
| 2022 | Oudman, S., van de Pol, J., & van Gog, T. (2022). Effects of self-scoring their math problem solutions on primary school students’ monitoring and regulation. Metacognition and Learning, 17(1), 213-239. | Springer | ||
| 2018 | Kim, J. H. (2018). The effect of metacognitive monitoring feedback on performance in a computer-based training simulation. Applied ergonomics, 67, 193-202. | ScienceDirect | ||
| 2021 | Fiedler, K., Ermark, F. & Salmen, K. (2021). English translation of: Metakognitive Kurzsichtigkeit – Hindernis für intelligentes Verhalten und Versäumnis der Evolution? In R.M. Holm-Hadulla, J. Funke & M. Wink (Hrsg.), Intelligenz – Theoretische Grundlagen und praktische Anwendungen. Heidelberger Jahrbücher Online (Band 6). | |||
| 2016 | Fiedler, K., Kareev, Y., Avrahami, J., Beier, S., Kutzner, F., & Hütter, M. (2016). Anomalies in the detection of change: When changes in sample size are mistaken for changes in proportions. Memory & Cognition, 44(1), 143–161. | Springer | ||
| 2023 | Burton, O.R., Bodner, G.E., Williamson, P. et al. (2023). How accurate and predictive are judgments of solvability? Explorations in a two-phase anagram solving paradigm. Metacognition & Learning, 18, 1-35. | Springer | ||
| 2023 | George, T., & Mielicki, M. K. (2023). Bullshit receptivity, problem solving, and metacognition: simply the BS, not better than all the rest. Thinking & Reasoning, 29, 213-249. | Tandfonline | ||
| 2022 | Rosenbaum, D., Glickman, M., Fleming, S. M., & Usher, M. (2022). The Cognition/Metacognition Trade-Off. Psychological Science, 33(4), 613-628. | Sage | ||
| 2022 | Rahnev, D., Balsdon, T., Charles, L., De Gardelle, V., Denison, R., Desender, K., ... & Zylberberg, A. (2022). Consensus goals in the field of visual metacognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(6), 1746-1765. | Sage | ||
| 2022 | Ghasemi, O., Handley, S., Howarth, S., Newman, I. R., & Thompson, V. A. (2022). Logical intuition is not really about logic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151(9), 2009–2028. | APA PsycNET | ||
| 2019 | Samaha, J., Switzky, M., & Postle, B. R. (2019). Confidence boosts serial dependence in orientation estimation. Journal of Vision, 19(4), Article 25. | Arvojournals | ||
| 2018 | Desender, K., Boldt, A., & Yeung, N. (2018). Subjective confidence predicts information seeking in decision making. Psychological science, 29(5), 761-778. | Sage | ||
| 2020 | Rahnev, D. (2020). Confidence in the real world. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(8), 590-591. | ScienceDirect | ||
| 2023 | Purcell, Z. A., Wastell, C. A., & Sweller, N. (2023). Eye movements reveal that low confidence precedes deliberation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76(7), 1539-1546. | Sage | ||
| 2017 | Desender, K., Van Opstal, F., & Van den Bussche, E. (2017). Subjective experience of difficulty depends on multiple cues. Scientific Reports, 7:44222 | Nature | ||
| 2022 | Desender, K., Vermeylen, L. & Verguts, T. (2022). Dynamic influences on static measures of metacognition. Nature communications, 13, 4208. | Nature | ||
| 2022 | Desender, K., Sasanguie, D. (2022). Math anxiety relates positively to metacognitive insight into mathematical decision making. Psychological Research, 86, 1001–1013. | Springer | ||
| 2022 | Law, M. K., Stankov, L., & Kleitman, S. (2022). I choose to opt-out of answering: Individual differences in giving up behaviour on cognitive tests. Journal of Intelligence, 10(4), 86. | MDPI | ||
| 2022 | Moroshkina, N. V., Savina, A. I., Ammalainen, A. V., Gershkovich, V. A., Zverev, I. V., & Lvova, O. V. (2022). How difficult was it? Metacognitive judgments about problems and their solutions after the Aha moment. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 911904. | Frontiers | ||
| 2021 | Ammalainen, A., & Moroshkina, N. (2021). The effect of true and false unreportable hints on anagram problem solving, restructuring, and the Aha!-experience. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 33(6-7), 644-658. | Tandfonline | ||
| 2022 | Caro, M. F., Cox, M. T., & Toscano-Miranda, R. E. (2022). A Validated Ontology for Metareasoning in Intelligent Systems. Journal of Intelligence, 10(4), 113. | MDPI | ||
| 2022 | Ammalainen, A., & Moroshkina, N. (2022). Where Does Eureka Come From? The Effect of Unreportable Hints on the Phenomenology of Insight. Journal of Intelligence, 10(4), 110. | MDPI | ||
| 2021 | Lee, D. G., & Daunizeau, J. (2021). Trading mental effort for confidence in the metacognitive control of value-based decision-making. eLife, 10, e63282. | eLife | ||
| 2009 | Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and social psychology review, 13(3), 219-235. | Sage | ||
| 2008 | Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). The secret life of fluency. Trends in cognitive sciences, 12(6), 237-241. | ScienceDirect | ||
| 2016 | Thomson, K. S., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2016). Investigating an alternate form of the cognitive reflection test. Judgment & Decision Making, 11(1), 99–113. | sJDM | ||
| 2008 | Shah, A. K., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). Heuristics made easy: an effort-reduction framework. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 207–222. | APA PsycNET | ||
| 2007 | Alter, A. L., Oppenheimer, D. M., Epley, N., & Eyre, R. N. (2007). Overcoming intuition: metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 136(4), 569-576. | APA PsycNET | ||
| 2011 | Diemand-Yauman, C., Oppenheimer, D. M., & Vaughan, E. B. (2011). Fortune Favors the Bold (and the italicized): Effects of disfluency on educational outcomes. Cognition, 118(1), 111-115. | ScienceDirect | ||
| 2021 | Fisher, M., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2021). Harder than you think: How outside assistance leads to overconfidence. Psychological Science, 32(4), 598-610. | Sage | ||
| 2015 | Atir, S., Rosenzweig, E., & Dunning, D. (2015). When knowledge knows no bounds: Self-perceived expertise predicts claims of impossible knowledge. Psychological Science, 26(8), 1295-1303. | Sage | ||
| 2021 | Kim, S., Le Guen, O., Sodian, B., & Proust, J. (2021). Are children sensitive to what they know?: An insight from Yucatec Mayan children. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 21(3-4), 226-242. | Brill | ||
| 2016 | Kim, S., Paulus, M., Sodian, B., & Proust, J. (2016). Young children’s sensitivity to their own ignorance in informing others. PloS one, 11(3), e0152595. | PlosOne | ||
| 2010 | Proust, J. (2010). Metacognition. Philosophy Compass, 5(11), 989-998. | Wiley | ||
| 2012 | Beran, M. J., Perner, J., & Proust, J. (Eds.). (2012). Foundations of metacognition. Oxford University Press. | Book | ||
| 2023 | Goupil, L., & Proust, J. (2023). Curiosity as a metacognitive feeling. Cognition, 231, 105325. | ScienceDirect | ||
| 2023 | Valerjev P, Dujmović M. Single-Heuristic Reasoning: Is It Still Dual-Process? Journal of Intelligence. 2023; 11(2):33. | MDPI | ||
| 2023 | Lee, D. G., Daunizeau, J., & Pezzulo, G. (2023). Evidence or confidence: What is really monitored during a decision?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 30, 1360–1379. | Springer | ||
| 2023 | Lee, D. G., & Hare, T. A. (2023). Value certainty and choice confidence are multidimensional constructs that guide decision-making. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 23, 503–521 | Springer | ||
| 2023 | Lee, D. G., & Usher, M. (2023). Value certainty in drift-diffusion models of preferential choice. Psychological Review, 130(3), 790–806. | APA | ||
| 2020 | Ordin, M., Polyanskaya, L., & Soto, D. (2020). Metacognitive processing in language learning tasks is affected by bilingualism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46(3), 529–538. | APA | ||
| 2022 | Polyanskaya, L., Manrique, H. M., Marín, A., García-Palacios, A., & Ordin, M. (2022). Typological differences influence the bilingual advantage in metacognitive processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151(11), 2706–2719. | APA | ||
| 2021 | Ordin, M., & Polyanskaya, L. (2021). The role of metacognition in recognition of the content of statistical learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28(1), 333–340. | Springer | ||
| 2023 | Kenett, Y. N., Gooz, N., & Ackerman, R. (2023). The role of semantic associations as a metacognitive cue in creative idea generation. Journal of Intelligence, 11(4), 59. | MDPI | ||
| 2023 | Polyanskaya, L. (2023). I know that I know. But do I know that I do not know?. Frontiers in Psychology, 14: 1128200. | ncbi | ||
| 2023 | Graf, M., Danek, A. H., Vaci, N., & Bilalić, M. (2023). Tracing Cognitive Processes in Insight Problem Solving: Using GAMs and Change Point Analysis to Uncover Restructuring. Journal of Intelligence, 11(5), 86. | MDPI | ||
| 2023 | Ackerman, R. (2023). Bird’s-Eye View of Cue Integration: Exposing Instructional and Task Design Factors Which Bias Problem Solvers. Educational Psychology Review, 35(2), 55. | Springer | ||
| 2022 | Thomas, C., Botella, M., & Didierjean, A. (2022). Fooling System 1 in the field of perception: Failure to intuitively detect attribute substitution in the flushtration count illusion. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75(11), 2149-2158. | Sage | ||
| 2023 | Mata, A. (2023). Overconfidence in the Cognitive Reflection Test: Comparing Confidence Resolution for Reasoning vs. General Knowledge. Journal of Intelligence, 11(5), 81. | MDPI | ||
| 2023 | Stewart, K. M., Risko, E. F., & Fugelsang, J. (2023). Response generation, not response execution, influences feelings of rightness in reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 17470218231156712. | Sage | ||
| 2024 | Fitzsimmons, C. J., & Thompson, C. A. (2024). Why Is Monitoring Accuracy so Poor in Number Line Estimation? The Importance of Valid Cues and Systematic Variability For US College Students. Metacognition and Learning, 19(1), 21-52. | Springer | ||
| 2023 | Coldren, J. (2023). Conditions under which college students cease learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 14: 1116853. | ncbi | ||
| 2023 | Osmólska, D., & Lewis, A. (2023). Architects' use of intuition in site analysis: Information gathering in solution development. Design Studies, 87, 101189. | ScienceDirect | ||
| 2023 | Hoch, E., Sidi, Y., Ackerman, R., Hoogerheide, V., & Scheiter, K. (2023). Comparing mental effort, difficulty, and confidence appraisals in problem-solving: A metacognitive perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 35:61. | Springer | ||
| 2022 | Fitzsimmons, C. J., & Thompson, C. A. (2022). Developmental differences in monitoring accuracy and cue use when estimating whole-number and fraction magnitudes. Cognitive Development, 61, 101148. | ScienceDirect | ||
| 2021 | Rivers, M. L., Fitzsimmons, C. J., Fisk, S. R., Dunlosky, J., & Thompson, C. A. (2021). Gender differences in confidence during number-line estimation. Metacognition and Learning, 16, 157-178. | Springer | ||
| 2005 | Cox, M. T. (2005). Metacognition in computation: A selected research review. Artificial Intelligence. 169 (2), 104-141. | ScienceDirect | ||
| 2021 | Cox, M. T., Mohammad, Z., Kondrakunta, S., Gogineni, V. R., Dannenhauer, D. & Larue, O. (2021). Computational metacognition. In Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Conference on Advances in Cognitive Systems. Palo Alto, CA: Cognitive Systems Foundation. | Arxiv | ||
| 2022 | Drummond Otten, C., & Fischhoff, B. (2022). Calibration of scientific reasoning ability. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, e2306. | Wiley | ||
| 2019 | Teovanović, P. (2019). Dual processing in syllogistic reasoning: An individual differences perspective. Psihologijske teme, 28(1), 125-145. | Hrcak | ||
| 2023 | Wang, T., & Lajoie, S. P. (2023). How does cognitive load interact with self-regulated learning? A dynamic and integrative model. Educational Psychology Review, 35(3), 69. | Springer | ||
| 2023 | Scheibe, D. A., Was, C. A., Dunlosky, J., & Thompson, C. A. (2023). Metacognitive cues, working memory, and math anxiety: The Regulated Attention in Mathematical Problem Solving (RAMPS) Framework. Journal of Intelligence, 11(6), 117. | MDPI | ||
| 2023 | Ackerman, R., & Morsanyi, K. (2023). We know what stops you from thinking forever: A metacognitive perspective. Behavioral and Brain Science, 46, e112. | BBS | ||
| 2024 | Lauterman, T. & Ackerman, R. (2024). Initial judgment of solvability: Integrating prior expectations with experience-based heuristic cues. Thinking & Reasoning, 30:1, 135-168. | Tandfonline | ||
| 2021 | Rabb, N., Han, J. J., & Sloman, S. A. (2021). How others drive our sense of understanding of policies. Behavioural Public Policy, 5(4), 454-479. | Cambridge | ||
| 2025 (in press) | de Chantal, P.-L., & Organisciak, P. (in press). Automated feedback and creativity: On the role of metacognitive monitoring in divergent thinking. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. | APA PsycNET | ||
| 2023 | Proust, J. (2023). Informational communication and metacognition. Evolutionary Linguistic Theory, 5(1), 11-52. | JBE | ||
| 2023 | Proust, J. (2023). What can metacognition teach us about the evolution of communication?. Evolutionary Linguistic Theory, 5(1), 1-10. | JBE | ||
| 2023 | Byrd, N., Joseph, B., Gongora, G., & Sirota, M. (2023). Tell us what you really think: A think aloud protocol analysis of the verbal cognitive reflection test. Journal of Intelligence, 11(4), 76. | MDPI | ||
| 2011 | Moss, J., Kotovsky, K., & Cagan, J. (2011). The effect of incidental hints when problems are suspended before, during, or after an impasse. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(1), 140–148. | APA PsycNET | ||
| 2023 | Strudwicke, H. W., Bodner, G. E., Williamson, P., & Arnold, M. M. (2023). Open-minded and reflective thinking predicts reasoning and meta-reasoning: evidence from a ratio-bias conflict task. Thinking & Reasoning, 30(3), 419–445. | Tandfonline | ||
| 2023 | Carlebach, N., & Yeung, N. (2023). Flexible use of confidence to guide advice requests. Cognition, 230, 105264. | ScienceDirect | ||
| 2020 | Carlebach, N., & Yeung, N. (2020). Subjective confidence acts as an internal cost-benefit factor when choosing between tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 46(7), 729–748. | APA PsycNET | ||
| 2023 | Kenett, Y. N., & Ackerman, R. (2023). Creative Metacognition: A much needed bridge between Meta-Reasoning and Creativity. Physics of Life Reviews, 47, 162-164. | ScienceDirect | ||
| 2024 | Ackerman, R., & Levontin, L. (2024). Mindset effects on the regulation of thinking time in problem-solving. Thinking & Reasoning, 30(3), 479-508. | Tandfonline | ||
| 2014 | Pretz, J. E., & McCollum, V. A. (2014). Self-perceptions of creativity do not always reflect actual creative performance. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(2), 227–236. | APA PsycNET | ||
| 2023 | Simonovic, B., Vione, K., Stupple, E. J. N., & Doherty, A. (2023). It is not what you think it is how you think: a critical thinking intervention enhances argumentation, analytic thinking and metacognitive sensitivity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 49, 101362. | ScienceDirect | ||
| 2023 | George, T., & Salvi, C. (2023). Putting the framework to work: Comment on" a systematic framework of creative metacognition" by Lebuda & Benedek. Physics of Life Reviews, 47, 203-206. | ScienceDirect | ||
| 2023 | Schulz, L., Fleming, S. M., & Dayan, P. (2023). Metacognitive computations for information search: Confidence in control. Psychological Review, 130(3), 604–639. | APA PsycNET | ||
| 2023 | McWilliams, A., Bibby, H., Steinbeis, N., David, A. S., & Fleming, S. M. (2023). Age-related decreases in global metacognition are independent of local metacognition and task performance. Cognition, 235, 105389. | ScienceDirect | ||
| 2023 | Metcalfe, J., Vuorre, M., Towner, E., & Eich, T. S. (2023). Curiosity: The effects of feedback and confidence on the desire to know. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 152(2), 464–482. | APA PsycNET | ||
| 2021 | Janssen, E. M., Velinga, S. B., De Neys, W., & van Gog, T. (2021). Recognizing biased reasoning: Conflict detection during decision-making and decision-evaluation. Acta Psychologica, 217, 103322. | ScienceDirect | ||
| 2022 | Preiss, D. D. (2022). Metacognition, mind wandering, and cognitive flexibility: Understanding creativity. Journal of Intelligence, 10(3), 69. | MDPI | ||
| 2023 | Comay, N. A., Della Bella, G., Lamberti, P., Sigman, M., Solovey, G., & Barttfeld, P. (2023). The presence of irrelevant alternatives paradoxically increases confidence in perceptual decisions. Cognition, 234, 105377. | ScienceDirect | ||
| 2023 | Valueva, E. А., & Lapteva, N. M. (2023). “AHA!” and “OH YES!”: How emotions affect insight experience. Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики, 20(3), 428-444. | CyberLEninka | ||
| 2023 | Shumilov, T. V., Chistopolskaya, A. V., & Vladimirov, I. Y. (2023). The path to insight: developing methods to increase the effectiveness of insightful solution detection. Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики, 20(3), 473-489. | CyberLEninka | ||
| 2023 | Baron, J. (2023). Individual differences and multi-step thinking. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 46, e114. | Cambridge | ||
| 1991 | Baron, J., Badgio, P. C., & Ritov, Y. (1991). Departures from optimal stopping in an anagram task. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 35(1), 41-63. | ScienceDirect | ||
| 2023 | Wang, X., Chen, L., Liu, X., Wang, C., Zhang, Z., & Ye, Q. (2023). The screen inferiority depends on test format in reasoning and meta-reasoning tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1067577. | Frontiers | ||
| 2024 | Valente, M. B. (2024). Ancient Greek mathematical proofs and Metareasoning. In Research in History and Philosophy of Mathematics: The CSHPM 2022 Volume (pp. 15-33). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. | Springer | ||
| 2024 | Wiley, J., & Danek, A. H. (2024). Restructuring processes and Aha! experiences in insight problem solving. Nature Reviews Psychology, 3, 42-55. | Nature | ||
| 2023 | Nadurak, V. (2023). Dual-Process Theory and two types of metacognitive monitoring and control processes. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 57, 1273–1283. | Springer | ||
| 2024 | Moroshkina, N. V., Pavliuchik, E. I., Ammalainen, A. V., & Gershkovich, V. A. (2024). The Aha! experience is associated with a drop in the perceived difficulty of the problem. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1314531. | Frontiers | ||
| 2024 | Fleming, S. M. (2024). Metacognition and confidence: A review and synthesis. Annual Review of Psychology, 75, 241-268. | Annual Review | ||
| 2024 | Richardson, B. H., & Ball, L. (2024). Progressing the development of a collaborative metareasoning framework: Prospects and challenges. Journal of Intelligence, 12: 28. | MDPI | ||
| 2023 | Herrmann, J. W. (2023). Introduction to Metareasoning. In Metareasoning for Robots: Adapting in Dynamic and Uncertain Environments (pp. 1-16). Cham: Springer International Publishing. | Springer | ||
| 2023 | Galitsky B, Ilvovsky D, Goldberg S. (2023) Shaped-Charge Learning Architecture for the Human–Machine Teams. Entropy. 25(6):924. https://doi.org/10.3390/e25060924 | MDPI | ||
| 2024 | Kolvoort, I. R., Fisher, E. L., van Rooij, R., Schulz, K., & van Maanen, L. (2024). Probabilistic causal reasoning under time pressure. Plos one, 19(4), e0297011. | PlosOne | ||
| 2024 | Sidi, Y., & Ackerman , R. (2024). Opting out as an untapped resource in instructional design: Review and implications. Educational Psychology Review, 36, 41 | Springer | ||
| 2024 | Cash, T. N., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2024). Parental rights or parental wrongs: Parents’ metacognitive knowledge of the factors that influence their school choice decisions. Plos one, 19(4), e0301768. | PlosOne | ||
| 2023 | Herrmann, J. W. (2023). Metareasoning for Robots: Adapting in Dynamic and Uncertain Environments. Springer Nature. | Springer | ||
| 2024 | Urban, K., & Urban, M. (2024). “I know my idea is original!” Creative Metacognitive Monitoring and Regulation in Kindergarten Children. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 101541. | ScienceDirect | ||
| 2024 | Lebuda, I., & Benedek, M. (2025). Contributions of metacognition to creative performance and behavior. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 59(1), e652. | Wiley | ||
| 2025 (in press) | Benedek, M., & Lebuda, I. (in press). Managing your muse: Exploring three levels of metacognitive control in creative ideation. Creativity Research Journal. | Tandfonline | ||
| 2024 | Prenevost, M. H., & Reber, R. (2024) The aha moment: Changes in cognition, affect, motivation, and development. In The Routledge International Handbook of Changes in Human Perceptions and Behaviors (pp. 187-204). Routledge. | Taylor & Francis | ||
| 2024 | Geers, M., Fischer, H., Lewandowsky, S., & Herzog, S. M. (2024). The political (a) symmetry of metacognitive insight into detecting misinformation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 153(8), 1961–1972. | APA PsycNET | OSF | |
| 2024 | Lebuda, I., Hofer, G., Rominger, C., & Benedek, M. (2024). No strong support for a Dunning–Kruger effect in creativity: analyses of self-assessment in absolute and relative terms. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 11883. | Nature | ||
| 2023 | Sirota, M., Juanchich, M., & Holford, D. L. (2023). Rationally irrational: When people do not correct their reasoning errors even if they could.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 152(7), 2052–2073. | APA PsycNET | ||
| 2021 | Sirota, M., Theodoropoulou, A., & Juanchich, M. (2021). Disfluent fonts do not help people to solve math and non-math problems regardless of their numeracy. Thinking & Reasoning, 27(1), 142–159. | Tandfonline | ||
| 2022 | Cloude, E. B., Wiedbusch, M. D., Dever, D. A., Torre, D., & Azevedo, R. (2022). The role of metacognition and self-regulation on clinical reasoning: Leveraging multimodal learning analytics to transform medical education. In The multimodal learning analytics handbook (pp. 105-129). Cham: Springer International Publishing. | Springer | ||
| 2024 | Baron, J. (2024). Two components of individual differences in actively open-minded thinking standards: myside bias and uncertainty aversion. Thinking & Reasoning, 30(4), 648-673. | Tandfonline | ||
| 2013 | De Martino, B., Fleming, S. M., Garrett, N., & Dolan, R. J. (2013). Confidence in value-based choice. Nature neuroscience, 16(1), 105-110. | Nature | ||
| 2023 | Białek, M. (2023). Why should we study the Foreign Language Effect: debiasing through affecting metacognition?. Journal of Intelligence, 11(6), 103. | MDPI | ||
| 2024 | Janssen, N., & Lazonder, A. W. (2024). Meta-analysis of interventions for monitoring accuracy in problem solving. Educational Psychology Review, 36(3), 96. | Springer | ||
| 2024 | Richardson, B. H., & Ball, L. J. (2024). Progressing the development of a collaborative metareasoning framework: Prospects and challenges. Journal of Intelligence, 12(3), 28. | MDPI | ||
| 2024 | Atir, S., Rosenzweig, E., & Dunning, D. (2024). Does expertise protect against overclaiming false knowledge?. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 184, 104354. | ScienceDirect | ||
| 2025 (in press) | Atir, S. & Risen, J. (in press). The paradox of explaining: When feeling unknowledgeable prevents learners from engaging in effective learning strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. | APA PsycNET | ||
| 2020 | Meyers, E. A., Turpin, M. H., Białek, M., Fugelsang, J. A., & Koehler, D. J. (2020). Inducing feelings of ignorance makes people more receptive to expert (economist) opinion. Judgment and Decision Making, 15(6), 909-925. | Cambridge | ||
| 2020 | Białek, M., Muda, R., Stewart, K., Niszczota, P., & Pieńkosz, D. (2020). Thinking in a foreign language distorts allocation of cognitive effort: Evidence from reasoning. Cognition, 205, 104420. | ScienceDirect | ||
| 2023 | Voudouri, A., Białek, M., Domurat, A., Kowal, M., & De Neys, W. (2023). Conflict detection predicts the temporal stability of intuitive and deliberate reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 29(4), 427-455. | Tandfonline | ||
| 2024 | Voudouri, A., Białek, M., & De Neys, W. (2024). Fast & slow decisions under risk: Intuition rather than deliberation drives advantageous choices. Cognition, 250, 105837. | ScienceDirect | ||
| 2022 | Milczarski, W., Borkowska, A., Paruzel-Czachura, M., & Białek, M. (2022). Using a foreign language does not make you think more: Null effects of using a foreign language on cognitive reflection and numeracy. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13670069231206701. | Sage | ||
| 2016 | Białek, M., & De Neys, W. (2016). Conflict detection during moral decision-making: Evidence for deontic reasoners’ utilitarian sensitivity. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28(5), 631-639. | Tandfonline | ||
| 2025 (in press) | Nadurak, V. (in press). How to evaluate the rationality of heuristics?. Thinking & Reasoning. | Tandfonline | ||
| 2025 (in press) | Urban, M., & Urban, K. (in press). Does metacognition matter in creative problem-solving? A mixed-methods analysis of writing. The Journal of Creative Behavior. | Wiley | ||
| 2025 (in press) | Urban, M., & Urban, K. (in press). Do we need metacognition for creativity? A necessary condition analysis of creative metacognition. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and Arts. | APA PsycNET | ||
| 2021 | Jussupow, E., Spohrer, K., Heinzl, A., & Gawlitza, J. (2021). Augmenting medical diagnosis decisions? An investigation into physicians’ decision-making process with artificial intelligence. Information Systems Research, 32(3), 713-735. | PubsOnline | ||
| 2009 | Cooper, L., Gale, A., Darker, I., Toms, A., & Saada, J. (2009). Radiology image perception and observer performance: How does expertise and clinical information alter interpretation? Stroke detection explored through eye-tracking. Medical Imaging: Image perception, observer performance, and technology assessment, | SPIE | ||
| 2024 | Janssen, N., & Lazonder, A. W. (2024). Meta-analysis of interventions for monitoring accuracy in problem solving. Educational Psychology Review, 36(3), 1-29. | Springer | ||
| 2025 (in press) | Cash, T. N., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (in press). Assessing metacognitive knowledge in subjective decisions: The knowledge of weights paradigm. Thinking & Reasoning | Tandfonline | ||
| 2023 | Calder-Travis, J., Bogacz, R., & Yeung, N. (2023). Expressions for Bayesian confidence of drift diffusion observers in fluctuating stimuli tasks. Journal of mathematical psychology, 117, 102815. | ScienceDirect | ||
| 2024 | Ordin, M., El-Dakhs, D. A. S., Tao, M., Chu, F., & Polyanskaya, L. (2024). Cultural influence on metacognition: comparison across three societies. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 1492 . | Nature | ||
| 2022 (new) | Ashburner, M., & Risko, E. F. (2022). On the influence of evaluation context on judgments of effort. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 48(8), 790–811. | APA PsycNET | ||
| 2022 (new) | Savinova, A., & Korovkin, S. (2022). Surprise! Why insightful solution is pleasurable. Journal of Intelligence, 10(4), 98. | MDPI | ||
| 2021 (new) | Korovkin, S., Savinova, A., Padalka, J., & Zhelezova, A. (2021). Beautiful mind: grouping of actions into mental schemes leads to a full insight Aha! experience. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 33(6-7), 620-630. | Tandfonline | ||
| 2025 (in press) (new) | George, T., & Kiran Rao, T. (in press). The role of subjective accessibility in metacognitive judgments of creative performance. Thinking & Reasoning. | Tandfonline | ||
| 2024 (new) | Binnendyk, J., & Pennycook, G. (2024). Individual differences in overconfidence: A new measurement approach. Judgment and Decision Making, 19, e28. | Cambridge | ||
| 2025 (new) | Atir, S., Rosenzweig, E., & Dunning D. A. (2025). When do people claim to know the unknowable? The impact of informational context on overclaiming. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 186, 104390. | Sciencedirect | ||
| 2025 (in press) (new) | Atir, S. & Dunning, D. A. (in press). Learning more than you can know: Introductory education produces overly expansive self-assessments of knowledge. Management Science. | TBD | ||
| 2025 (new) | Eberhart, J., Ingendahl, F., & Bryce, D. (2025). Are metacognition interventions in young children effective? Evidence from a series of meta-analyses. Metacognition and Learning, 20(1), 7. | Springer | ||
| 2025 (new) | Eberhart, J., Murayama, K., Sakaki, M., & Bryce, D. (2025). Metacognitive monitoring in early elementary school-aged children: Task dependency in monitoring judgements, task consistency in monitoring behaviours. Cognitive Development, 74, 101561 | Sciencedirect | ||
| 2025 (in press) (new) | George, T., & Kiran Rao, T. (in press). The role of subjective accessibility in metacognitive judgments of creative performance. Thinking & Reasoning. | Tandfonline | ||
| 2025 (in press) (new) | Thompson. V, & Markovits, H. (in press). Fast Reasoning and Metacognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. | TBD | ||
| 2025 (new) | Fischer, H., Kause, A., & Huff, M. (2025). Intellectual humility links to metacognitive ability. Personality and Individual Differences, 238, 113028. | Sciencedirect |